Coronavirus Anxiety Level and COVID-19 Vaccine Attitude Among Patients With Hematological Malignancies.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 vaccine is the most essential tool for altering the pandemic's trajectory. The pandemic's control is complicated by society's unwillingness to vaccinate. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to assess patients with hematological malignancies and their attitudes regarding COVID-19 immunization and to investigate COVID-19 anxiety in this susceptible population. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 165 patients with hematological malignancies were included. COVID-19 anxiety was evaluated with the coronavirus anxiety scale (CAS), and COVID-19 vaccine attitude was evaluated with the Vaccine Attitudes Review (VAX) scale. RESULTS: The mean CAS score was 2.42 (0-17). There were 22 (13%) participants with a mean CAS score of ≥ 9. Half of the participants had a CAS score of 0. The CAS score was higher in females (p = 0.023). Similarly, it was significantly higher in patients who were not in remission for hematological malignancy and who received active chemotherapy (p = 0.010). The mean VAX score was 49.07 ± 8.76 (27-72). Most of the participants (64%) had a neutral attitude toward the COVID-19 vaccination. In a survey of 165 patients, 55% said that they were skeptical about vaccination safety, and 58% said that they were concerned about unintended side effects. In addition, 90% expressed moderate concerns about commercial profiteering. Natural immunity was preferred by 30% of the participants. There was no statistically significant correlation between CAS scores and the Vaccine Attitudes Review (VAX) scale. CONCLUSION: This study draws attention to the level of anxiety in patients with hematological malignancies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Negative attitudes toward the COVID-19 vaccine are worrisome for at-risk patient groups. We think that patients with hematological malignancies should be informed to eliminate their hesitations about COVID-19 vaccines.

The Mental Health Status of Inpatients with Newly Diagnosed Hematological Cancer during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparison Study

Objective: This study is intended to evaluate the mental health statuses of hematological cancer (HC) inpatients diagnosed during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the statuses of patients diagnosed with HC before the pandemic. Method(s): A cross-sectional survey collected the mental health measurements of 77 inpatients with HC between March and May 2021 in Ankara, Turkey. The levels of depression, generalized anxiety, distress, sleep disorder, health anxiety, trait anxiety, corona phobia, and resilience in HC patients newly diagnosed during the pandemic (n=38) and before the pandemic (n=39) were compared. We then explored the relationships between predictive factors and cancer patients' mental health statuses. Result(s): Compared to HC patients diagnosed before the pandemic, depression (63.2% vs. 35.9%, p=0.017) and sleep disorder (67.8% vs. 38.5, p=0.016) were significantly higher, while comparison, generalized anxiety (57.9% vs. 38.5%, p=0.088) and distress (60.5% vs. 38.5%, p=0.053) were higher in a non-significant trend in patients newly diagnosed with HC during the pandemic. In contrast, health anxiety was more common in patients diagnosed before the pandemic (53.8% vs. 31.6%, p=0.048). Among the newly diagnosed patients, women had more generalized anxiety symptoms than men (76.5% vs. 42.9%, p=0.037). Being newly diagnosed increased the risk of more severe symptoms of depression (odds ratio [OR]: 3.178, p=0.036) and sleep disorders (OR: 4.73, p=0.018) but lowered the risk of health anxiety (OR: 0.14, p=0.003). Conclusion(s): Our data indicate that patients with HC are vulnerable to mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic. This vulnerability is higher in newly diagnosed HC patients than in patients diagnosed before the pandemic. Copyright © Telif Hakki 2023 Gazi Universitesi Tip Fakultesi - Makale.

Global reported impacts of COVID-19 on lymphoma patients and the emerging clinical management approaches in response to the ongoing pandemic.

The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has dramatically impacted the health risk and management of patients with lymphoma. Clinical evaluations on the impact of COVID-19 on lymphoma patients are currently limited however, reports have shown a correlation with specific variants and more severe COVID-19 complications and higher mortality rates relative to other disease states and age-matched populations. During peak pandemic periods this created a concerning management problem for clinicians and raised the question of how different immunocompromised states increase COVID-19-associated risk and provided insights into how immunity interacts with the circulating variant, including the effects of low virulent variants in vaccinated lymphoma populations. Treatment management approaches, polymerase chain reaction tests and rapid antigen screening guidelines have been offered in an attempt to reduce the risk of harm to lymphoma patients, particularly prior to and following bone marrow or stem cell transplant. Here we systematically review the current literature to provide a novel global perspective on incidence, mortality, management and rapid antigen test (RAT) screening for COVID-19, in patients with various subtypes of lymphoma. Furthermore, lessons learned from emerging variants that continue to inform evolving lymphoma management and public health policies are addressed across these associated matters.

Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Adults (MIS-A) Reported in Patient with Hematological Malignancy: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has persisted for over 2 years worldwide and has long-term effects on the health and quality of life of convalescents. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome, primary observed in children is currently increasingly recognized in adults. Immunopathology might play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in adults (MIS-A); therefore, the occurrence of MIS-A in non-immunocompetent patients is a significant challenge in diagnosis and treatment. CASE PRESENTATION: We described a 65-year-old patient with Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) who suffered from MIS-A after COVID-19 and was successfully treated with high doses of immunoglobulins and steroids. CONCLUSION: Our study presents for the first time a case of MIS-A in a hematological patient with a broad spectrum of symptoms reflecting multiorgan damage and suggests the long-term consequences of MIS-A as persistent immune dysregulation involving T-cell response.

Real-World Effectiveness of Tixagevimab and Cilgavimab (Evusheld) in Patients With Hematological Malignancies.

Background: Immunocompromised individuals with hematological malignancy have increased risk for poor outcomes and death from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). This special population may mount a suboptimal response to vaccination. We assessed the effectiveness of tixagevimab and cilgavimab (Evusheld), a monoclonal antibody combination against SARS-CoV-2, in conjunction with standard preventative measures, at preventing symptomatic incident infection. Methods: Patients aged 18 years and older with hematological malignancy consented to receive Evusheld. Patients were followed longitudinally for development of symptomatic incident SARS-CoV-2 infections. Adverse events were monitored. Results: Two hundred and three patients (94 female) with hematological malignancies and mean age 72 ± 10 years were included. Of the patients, 99.5% had received at least one mRNA vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. Average time of follow-up was 151 ± 50 days. Nineteen patients (9.3%) developed incident symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, with only one (0.5%) requiring hospitalization. During the same follow-up period, local incident rate of infection was 84,123 cases (11.3% of population). Of those, 3,386 cases (4%) of SARS-CoV-2 required hospital admission. The incidence rate ratio was 0.79. No serious adverse events occurred following administration of Evusheld. Conclusion: Patients with hematological malignancy who received Evusheld infrequently developed symptomatic infections or require hospitalization. The high-risk cohort incidence was at least as comparable to the average risk general population. Evusheld appears effective and is well tolerated, and may be administered in conjunction with vaccination and standard prevention measures, at decreasing incident SARS-Co-V2 cases in this high-risk population.

Effectiveness of Convalescent Plasma Therapy in COVID-19 Patients with Hematological Malignancies: A Systematic Review.

Background: Immunocompromised patients, including those with hematological malignancies, are at a high risk of developing severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) complications. Currently, there is a limited number of systematic reviews into the efficacy of convalescent plasma therapy (CPT) use in the treatment of COVID-19 patients with hematological malignancies. Therefore, the aim of this review was to systematically appraise the current evidence for the clinical benefits of this therapy in COVID-19 patients with hematological malignancies. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted up to April 2022, using four databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Science Direct, and Scopus. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of the included studies. Data collection analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel 365 and GraphPad Prism software. Results: 18 studies met the inclusion criteria; these records included 258 COVID-19 patients who had hematological malignancies and were treated with CPT. The main findings from the reviewed data suggest that CPT may be associated with improved clinical outcomes, including (a) higher survival rate, (b) improved SARS-CoV-2 clearance and presence of detectable anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies post CP transfusion, and (c) improved hospital discharge time and recovery after 1 month of CPT. Furthermore, treatment with convalescent plasma was not associated with the development of adverse events. Conclusions: CPT appears to be an effective supportive therapeutic option for hematological malignancy patients infected with COVID-19. To our knowledge, this is one of the first systematic reviews of the clinical benefits of CPT in COVID-19 patients with hematological malignancies.

The course of COVID-19 in patients with hematological malignancies and risk factors affecting mortality: A cross-sectional study.

Objective: This study aimed to determine the clinical outcomes and risk factors affecting mortality in patients with COVID-19 following hematological malignancy (HM). Methods: Patients diagnosed with HM and hospitalized for COVID-19 were included in this retrospective study. The age, demographic and clinical characteristics, prognosis and treatment of surviving and non-surviving patients were compared. Results: A total of 49 patients were included in this study, 17 (34.6%) of whom died within 28 days of being diagnosed with COVID-19. Older age (p = 0.001), diabetes (p = 0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p = 0.002), secondary infection (p < 0.001) and secondary bacterial infection (p = 0.005) were statistically significantly higher in non-survivors. The remission status of HM was higher in surviving patients (p < 0.001). In multivariate regression analysis, age (OR: 1.102, p = 0.035) and secondary infection (OR: 16.677, p = 0.024) were risk factors increasing mortality, the remission status of HM (OR: 0.093, p = 0.047) was a protective factor from mortality. Conclusion: The older age, the remission status of HM and secondary infection due to COVID-19 were determined as prognostic factors predicting mortality in HM patients with following COVID-19.

Lack of efficacy of convalescent plasma in COVID-19 patients with concomitant hematological malignancies: An Italian retrospective study.

A multicenter retrospective study was designed to assess clinical outcome of COVID-19 in patients with hematological malignancies (HM) following treatment with anti-SARS-CoV-2 convalescent plasma (CP) or standard of care therapy. To this aim, a propensity score matching was used to assess the role of non-randomized administration of CP in this high-risk cohort of patients from the Italian Hematology Alliance on COVID-19 (ITA-HEMA-COV) project, now including 2049 untreated control patients. We investigated 30- and 90-day mortality, rate of admission to intensive care unit, proportion of patients requiring mechanical ventilatory support, hospitalization time, and SARS-CoV-2 clearance in 79 CP recipients and compared results with 158 propensity score-matched controls. Results indicated a lack of efficacy of CP in the study group compared with the untreated group, thus confirming the negative results obtained from randomized studies in immunocompetent individuals with COVID-19. In conclusion, this retrospective analysis did not meet the primary and secondary end points in any category of immunocompromized patients affected by HM.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of immune response against first and second doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in adult patients with hematological malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients particularly those with hematological malignancies are at higher risk of affecting by severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Due to the immunocompromised nature of the disease and the immunosuppressive treatments, they are more likely to develop less antibody protection; therefore, we aimed to evaluate the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with hematological malignancies. METHODS: A comprehensive systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, as well as Google scholar search engine as of December 10, 2021. Our primary outcomes of interest comprised of estimating the antibody seropositive rate following COVID-19 vaccination in patients with hematological malignancies and to compare it with those who were affected by solid tumors or healthy subjects. The secondary outcomes were to assess the vaccine's immunogenicity based on different treatments, status of the disease, and type of vaccine. After the two-step screening, the data were extracted and the summary measures were calculated using a random-effect model. RESULTS: A total of 82 articles recording 13,804 patients with a diagnosis of malignancy were included in the present review. The seropositive rates in patients with hematological malignancies after first and second vaccine doses were 30.0% (95% confidence interval (95%CI): 11.9-52.0) and 62.3% (95%CI 56.0-68.5), respectively. These patients were less likely to develop antibody response as compared to cases with solid tumors (RR 0.73, 95%CI 0.67-0.79) and healthy subjects (RR 0.62, 95%CI 0.54-0.71) following complete immunization. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients had the lowest response rate among all subtypes of hematological malignancies (first dose: 22.0%, 95%CI 13.5-31.8 and second dose: 47.8%, 95%CI 41.2-54.4). Besides, anti-CD20 therapies (5.7%, 95%CI 2.0-10.6) and bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (26.8%, 95%CI 16.9-37.8) represented the lowest seropositiveness post first and second doses, respectively. Notably, patients who were in active status of disease showed lower antibody detection rate compared to those on remission status (RR 0.87, 95%CI 0.76-0.99). Furthermore, lower rate of seropositivity was found in patients received BNT162.b2 compared to ones who received mRNA-1273 (RR 0.89, 95%CI 0.79-0.99). CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the substantially low rate of seroprotection in patients with hematological malignancies with a wide range of rates among disease subgroups and different treatments; further highlighting the fact that booster doses might be acquired for these patients to improve immunity against SARS-CoV-2.

A case of Bacillus subtilis var. natto bacteremia caused by ingestion of natto during COVID-19 treatment in a maintenance hemodialysis patient with multiple myeloma.

A 70-year-old woman, who started on hemodialysis 7 months before for end-stage renal disease due to diabetic nephropathy and was diagnosed with symptomatic multiple myeloma 1 month before, was admitted to our hospital with critical coronavirus disease 2019 and treated with long-term immunosuppressive therapy such as steroids and tocilizumab. During treatment, Bacillus subtilis was detected in the blood cultures. We could not exclude the association of natto (fermented soybeans) with B. subtilis var. natto, which the patient had been eating every day from 8 days after admission. She was prohibited from eating natto and treated with vancomycin. Later, B. subtilis detected in the blood culture was identified as B. subtilis var. natto, which was identical with those contained in the natto that the patient consumed daily using a next-generation sequencer. Gut dysbiosis due to old age, malignant tumor, diabetes mellitus, end-stage renal disease, and intestinal inflammation caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 increased intestinal permeability and the risk of bacterial translocation, causing B. subtilis var. natto bacteremia. Therefore, careful consideration might be given to the intake of fermented foods containing live bacteria in patients with severe immunocompromised conditions.

Omission of day 11 methotrexate in regimen for the prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease after haploid hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The regimen of cyclosporin combined with four times of short-range methotrexate is still recognized as the classic prevention regimen for acute graft-versus-host disease. Previous studies have shown that whether day 11 methotrexate is used in sibling transplantation has no effect on the incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease. However, the effect of reducing day 11 methotrexate on the incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease in haploid hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of the omission of day 11 methotrexate in the regimen for the prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease in haploid hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. METHODS: The clinical data of 63 patients with malignant hematologic diseases who received haploid hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from January 2017 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The graft-versus-host disease prevention regimen was cyclosporine combined with methotrexate 15 mg/m² on day 1, 10 mg/m² on day 3, day 6 and day 11. In the observation group (n=19), oral mucositis was grade III-IV at day 11, and day 11 methotrexate was cancelled. In the control group (n=44), oral mucositis was grade 0-II at day 11, and day 11 methotrexate was applied. The implantation situation, incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease, overall survival rate, and recurrence rate of the two groups were analyzed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: (1) The median follow-up time was 30(3-54) months and all neutrophils were successfully implanted in both groups. The median implantation time was 12(9-29) days and 12(8-25) days, respectively, showing no significant difference (P=0.682). There was one patient with poor platelet implantation in the observation group, and four patients with poor platelet implantation in the control group. The median time of platelet implantation was 12(9-18) days and 13(9-31) days in the two groups, respectively, (P=0.71), showing no statistical difference. (2) The overall incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease was 44.4%, and grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease was 28.6%. The incidence of II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease in the observation group and control group was 31.5% and 27.3%, respectively, (P=0.728), and there was no statistical difference between the two groups. (3) The results showed that for haploid hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, the omission of day 11 methotrexate did not increase the incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease compared with the standard methotrexate regimen. (English) [ FROM AUTHOR] 背景：环孢素联合4次短程甲氨蝶呤方案仍是目前公认的、经典的预防急性移植物抗宿主病方案，以往研究显示在同胞全相合移植后第11 天是否应用甲氨蝶呤对于急性移植物抗宿主病的发生率没有影响，但减少第11天甲氨蝶呤对单倍体造血干细胞移植患者急性移植物抗宿主 病发生率的影响仍不清楚。 目的：探讨移植物抗宿主病预防方案中去除第11天甲氨蝶呤的应用对单倍体造血干细胞移植患者发生急性移植物抗宿主病的影响。 方法：回顾性分析 2017年1月至2019年12月接受单倍体造血干细胞移植治疗的 63例恶性血液病患者的临床资料，移植物抗宿主病预防方案 为环孢素联合甲氨蝶呤15 mg/m²(第1天)，10 mg/m2(第3，6，11天)。在第11天时发生严重口腔黏膜炎(Ⅲ-Ⅳ级)的患者，取消第4次甲氨蝶 呤应用，归为观察组，共19例；在第11天时发生轻度口腔黏膜炎(0-Ⅱ级)的患者，按标准方案继续第4次甲氨蝶呤应用，归为对照组，共 44例。对两组植入情况、急性移植物抗宿主病发生率、总体生存率及复发率进行分析。 结果与结论：①中位随访时间 30(3-54)个月，两组患者中性粒细胞全部植活，中位植入时间分别为 12(9-29) d 和12(8-25) d，差异无显著 性意义(P=0.682)；观察组1例血小板植入不良，对照组4例血小板植入不良，可分析数据两组中位植入时间分别为 12(9-18) d 和13(9-31) d， 差异无显著性意义(P=0.71)；②急性移植物抗宿主病总体发生率为 44.4%，Ⅱ-Ⅳ度急性移植物抗宿主病为28.6%；观察组及对照组Ⅱ-Ⅳ度 急性移植物抗宿主病发生率分别为31.5%，27.3%，差异无显著性意义(P=0.728)；③结果表明，对于单倍体造血干细胞移植，与标准甲氨蝶 呤预防方案比较，去除第11天甲氨蝶呤的应用并不引起急性移植物抗宿主病发生率升高。 (Chinese) [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research / Zhongguo zu zhi gong cheng yan jiu is the property of Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

[Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 on Prognosis and Treatment Strategies in Patients with Hematological Malignancy--Review].

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread rapidly worldwide since outbreak in December 2019, and become a global public health crisis. Patients with hematological malignancy concurrently infected with COVID-19 are often associated with severe even fatal complications, due to low basic immune function, high intensity of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and slow immune reconstruction post hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and their treatment strategies, such as anti-infective therapy, blood transfusion, and the use of granulocyte colony stimulating factor need to be adjusted. The characteristics of patients, chemotherapy, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and other clinical factors may affect the prognosis of patients with hematological malignancy concurrently infected with COVID-19. Herein, the latest research progress is reviewed.

Special case of a patient in the blast phase of chronic myeloid leukemia successfully treated with tocilizumab during critical SARS-CoV-2 infection.

The medical care of patients with hematological malignancies who develop coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been a major challenge during the current pandemic. We herein describe a patient in the blast phase of chronic myeloid leukemia who was hospitalized for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. The patient was successfully treated with tocilizumab, and intubation was avoided. The severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection is mostly related to a severe acute respiratory distress syndrome that develops secondary to cytokine release syndrome, and interleukin 6 is the main cytokine involved in cytokine release syndrome. Very few reports have described the use of tocilizumab in patients with hematologic malignancies who develop SARS-CoV-2 infection, although a few cases of patients with multiple myeloma have been reported. To our knowledge, however, this is the first report of a SARS-CoV-2-infected patient in the blast phase of chronic myeloid leukemia who had a favorable response to treatment with tocilizumab. The management of patients with hematological malignancies who become infected with SARS-CoV-2 is a major challenge for practitioners, necessitating more specific research in this direction.

Successful early use of anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal neutralizing antibodies in SARS-CoV-2 infected hematological patients - A Czech multicenter experience.

COVID-19 significantly impairs survival rates among hematological patients when compared to the general population. Our prospective multicentre project analyzed early administration of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (NmAbs) - bamlanivimab (72%) and casirivimab/imdevimab (28%) - efficacy among hematological patients with early-stage COVID-19. Mortality rate was compared to a control cohort of 575 SARS-CoV-2 positive hematological patients untreated with any specific anti-COVID-19 therapy. 88 hematological patients with lymphomas, acute leukemias, and myeloma as their most frequent underlying diagnoses (72%) were evaluated with a 97 days median follow-up after NmAb administration. One third of patients (32%) were treated with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody before COVID-19 diagnosis. Median time between first COVID-19 symptom and NmAb administration was 2 days. When administering NmAb, 29%, 57%, 11%, 2%, and 1% of our patients had asymptomatic, mild, moderate, severe, and critical degrees of COVID-19, respectively. 80% of baseline asymptomatic patients remained asymptomatic following NmAb administration. Median duration of COVID-19 symptoms after NmAb administration was 2.5 days. Progression to severe/critical COVID-19 occurred among a total of 17% (15/88) of our cases and numerically higher with bamlanivimab versus casirivimab/imdevimab (21% vs. 8%; p = 0.215), and myelomas (29%), lymphomas (17%) and acute leukemias (18%), respectively. During final follow-up, nine deaths (10%) were recorded - all after bamlanivimab (p = 0.056) with 8% attributed to COVID-19. Regarding "remdesivir/convalescent plasma naïve" patients, COVID-19 mortality rates were significantly lower in our NmAbs treated cohort compared to the control cohort of untreated SARS-CoV-2 positive hematological patients (6% vs. 16%, p = 0.020), respectively. Our study validated the safety and efficacy of NmAbs early use among hematological patients with newly diagnosed early-stage COVID-19 in terms of alleviating infection course and decreasing mortality. Results confirmed a more positive effect of a casirivimab/imdevimab combination versus bamlanivimab monotherapy.

[A retrospective analysis of risk factors for severity of nosocomial COVID-19 in patients with hematological malignancy].

BACKGROUND: With the global spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), patients with cancer may be at a higher risk of suffering from COVID-19. Although patients with hematological malignancy (HM) are reported to have a higher risk of severe COVID-19 compared with those with solid cancer, the effects of treatment for HM on COVID-19 severity have not been fully elucidated. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the risk factors, including number and timing of chemotherapeutic regimens for HM, for COVID-19 severity in 17 patients with HM, who had developed nosocomial COVID-19 in our department, by dividing them into two groups; a severe group (N=7) and a non-severe group (N=10). RESULTS: The overall mortality rate was 47%, and mortality in the severe group was significantly higher than that in the non-severe group (odds ratio [OR], 18.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27-1223.17, P=0.02). Univariate analysis identified two or more chemotherapeutic regimens for HM (OR, 17.34; 95%CI, 1.15-1165.33, P=0.03) and a low hemoglobin level (P=0.02) as significant risk factors for COVID-19 severity. However, a history of chemotherapy for HM within 3 months prior to the onset of COVID-19 was not a significant risk factor (P=0.54). CONCLUSION: A history of multiple chemotherapeutic regimens in patients with HM may be a risk factor for COVID-19 severity, and physicians should be aware of this.

COVID-19 and seasonal influenza: a comparative analysis in patients with hematological malignancies.

The severity and mortality of COVID-19 and seasonal influenza were recently compared in the general population but not in patients with hematological malignancies. We analyzed the clinical courses of 79 patients with hematological malignancies and diagnosis of either SARS-CoV-2 (n = 29) or influenza A or B infections (n = 50) who were admitted or were already under treatment in the Department of Oncology, Hematology and Stem cell Transplantation at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany, between 1 January 2012 and 31 January 2021. For COVID-19, we observed significantly higher rates of acute respiratory distress syndrome with 48% (14/29) compared to 14% (7/50) in the influenza group (p = 0.001) as well as a significantly higher virus-associated 90-day mortality (41% vs. 12%, p = 0.005). Based on our results, we conclude that infections with SARS-CoV-2 are more severe than influenza A or B in patients with hematological malignancies.

Decline and incomplete recovery in cancer diagnoses during the COVID-19 pandemic in Belgium: a year-long, population-level analysis.

BACKGROUND: Oncological care was considerably impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Worrisome declines in diagnostic procedures and cancer diagnoses in 2020 have been reported; however, nationwide, population-based evidence is limited. Quantification of the magnitude and distribution of the remaining outstanding diagnoses is likewise lacking. METHODS: Using accelerated delivery of data from pathology laboratories to the Belgian Cancer Registry, we compared the nationwide rates of new diagnoses of invasive cancers in 2020 to 2019. RESULTS: We observed a 44% reduction in total diagnoses of invasive cancers in April 2020 compared with April 2019, coinciding with the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. The reduction was largest in older patients and for skin cancers (melanoma and nonmelanoma). Reductions in diagnosis were less pronounced among children and adolescents (0-19 years). A smaller decline was observed for most cancers with typically poorer prognosis or obvious symptoms, including some hematological malignancies, lung, and pancreatic cancer. Suspension of organized population screening programs was reflected in a strong decline in diagnosis in the screening age groups for female breast cancer (56%) and for colorectal cancer in both men (49%) and women (60%). The number of diagnoses began to increase from the end of April and stabilized at the beginning of June at or just above 2019 levels. There has yet to be a complete recovery in cancer diagnoses, with an estimated 6%, or ∼4000 diagnoses, still outstanding for all of 2020. Among solid tumors, head and neck cancers have the largest remaining year-over-year decrease in diagnoses at 14%. CONCLUSION: These results add to the evidence of a profound impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on oncological care and identify groups at risk for continuing diagnostic delays. These data should stimulate health care providers worldwide to facilitate targeted, accessible, and efficient procedures for detection of cancers affected by this delay.

Suboptimal Response to Coronavirus Disease 2019 Messenger RNA Vaccines in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies: A Need for Vigilance in the Postmasking Era.

We measured severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 immunoglobulin G responses in 67 patients with hematological malignancies after 2 messenger RNA vaccine doses. Forty-six percent were nonresponders; patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia were at highest risk (77% nonresponders). Patients with hematological malignancies should continue wearing masks and socially distancing. Studies of revaccination, boosters, and humoral immune correlates of protection are needed.

Fifth-week immunogenicity and safety of anti-SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 vaccine in patients with multiple myeloma and myeloproliferative malignancies on active treatment: preliminary data from a single institution.

BACKGROUND: Safety and immunogenicity of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine are unknown in hematological patients; both were evaluated prospectively in 42 patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and 50 with myeloproliferative malignancies (MPM) (20 chronic myeloid leukemias and 30 myeloproliferative neoplasms), all of them on active anti-cancer treatment, in comparison with 36 elderly controls not suffering from cancer. Subjects serologically and/or molecularly (by nasal/throat swab) positives at basal for SARS-CoV-2 were excluded. Primary endpoint was to compare titers of neutralizing anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and seroprotection rates among the cohorts at 3 and 5 weeks from first dose. METHODS: Titration was done using LIAISON® SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG test, a quantitative chemiluminescent immunoassay approved by FDA on the basis of robust evidences of concordance (94.4%) between the test at cutoff of 15 AU/mL and the Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test 90% at 1:40 ratio. Cutoff of 15 AU/mL was assumed to discriminate responders to vaccination with a protective titer. Cohorts were compared using Fisher' exact test and the Mann-Whitney test as appropriated. Geometric mean concentrations (GMCs), geometric mean ratios and response rates after 1st and 2nd dose were compared in each cohort by Wilcoxon and McNemar tests, respectively. RESULTS: At 5 weeks, GMC of IgG in elderly controls was 353.3 AU/mL versus 106.7 in MM (p = 0.003) and 172.9 in MPM patients (p = 0.049). Seroprotection rate at cutoff of 15 AU/mL was 100% in controls compared to 78.6% in MM (p = 0.003) and 88% in MPM patients (p = 0.038). In terms of logarithm of IgG titer, in a generalized multivariate linear model, no gender effect was observed (p = 0.913), while there was a significant trend toward lower titers by increasing age (p < 0.001) and in disease cohorts with respect to controls (MM: p < 0.001 and MPM: p < 0.001). An ongoing treatment without daratumumab was associated with higher likelihood of response in MM patients (p = 0.003). No swabs resulted positive on each time point. No safety concerns were observed. CONCLUSIONS: BNT162b2 has demonstrated to be immunogenic at different extent among the cohorts. Response was 88% and robust in MPM patients. MM patients responded significantly less, particularly those on anti-CD38-based treatment. These latter patients should be advised to maintain masks and social distancing regardless of vaccination status, and their cohabiting family members need to be vaccinated in order to reduce the risk of contagion from the family. Additional boosters and titer monitoring could be considered. Trial registration Study was formally approved by the IRCCS Central Ethical Committee of Regione Lazio in January 2021 (Prot. N-1463/21).

The outcome of COVID-19 in patients with hematological malignancy.

In this study, we aim to report the outcomes for COVID-19 in patients with hematological malignancy in Turkey. Data from laboratory-confirmed 188 897 COVID-19 patients diagnosed between 11 March 2020 and 22 June 2020 included in the Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Health database were analyzed retrospectively. All COVID-19 patients with hematological malignancy (n = 740) were included in the study and an age, sex, and comorbidity-matched cohort of COVID-19 patients without cancer (n = 740) at a 1:1 ratio was used for comparison. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (30.1%), myelodysplastic syndrome (19.7%), myeloproliferative neoplasm (15.7%) were the most common hematological malignancies. The rates of severe and critical disease were significantly higher in patients with hematological malignancy compared with patients without cancer (P = .001). The rates of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) admission were higher in patients with hematological malignancy compared with the patients without cancer (P = .023, P = .001, respectively). The length of hospital stay and ICU stay was similar between groups (P = .7, P = .3, retrospectively). The rate of mechanical ventilation (MV) support was higher in patients with hematological malignancy compared with the control group (P = .001). The case fatality rate was 13.8% in patients with hematological malignancy, and it was 6.8% in the control group (P = .001). This study reveals that there is an increased risk of COVID-19-related serious events (ICU admission, MV support, or death) in patients with hematological malignancy compared with COVID-19 patients without cancer and confirms the high vulnerability of patients with hematological malignancy in the current pandemic.